ALL Black, NEVER ALL White…
Name: massive_weapon | E-mail: maf22@guamcell.net | IP: 67.72.98.45 | Date: January 27, 2007
Did any of you catch that story about that Black college professor (I think that was his title) who called upon all the other blacks to exterminate white people!! That kind of person is despicable and extremely dangerous to this country. I value freedom of speech, much like what Warrior does here on his webpage/blogs, but there has to be a limit or some kind of restriction against inflammatory hate-speech like that. This person has no idea of how to co-exist with other races and what it REALLY means to be an American. Someone like that, who is so clearly racist should be excommunicated right out of this country pronto! After all the struggles in America’s history to establish equal rights, individual rights and freedoms and promote peace, stability and American values, this peace of trash comes along and starts spitting out that kind of venom. Disgusting to say the least. I’d like to get your opinion on this Warrior.
W- Just a quick comment on this, here, for all to see. The political correctness, capitulated to by politicians and THEIR self-indulgent, “my good friend across the aisle” political environment, is what has caused the toleration of this bs. This is America and, here inside this country, “American” is the standard by which all other non-American prejudices are to be judged. Those charged with protecting American ideals, principles, OUR American rights, and our DUE prejudice in American national sovereignty have surrendered. For three years, I participated in activism with organizations that claim they want to eradicate it, but they punch back like sissies and when the heat gets too hot, they cower into the fetal position. They conduct polls that show p/c (and moral relativity) is the greatest danger we face, but secure in their lucrative paychecks and beltway power, they leave the inevitable, future “shit hitting the fan” battle to the next generation (their children and ours). Blacks can have their own ALL Black ventures, Black TV, Black Ms. America, Black Caucus (in our American gov’t that IS ALL the People’s gov’t!) and on and on. Go do something “White”…write us when you, both, get out from under paying your legal bills and spending time in jail.
The best answer I can give you is to teach your children the difference between “prejudice” and “racism.” The former a necessary good thing; the latter flatout wrong. If I held the power, I’d do as Michael Savage (hardcore and right (correct) in his thinking about what to do and ripped off by other Conservative radio personalities) has spoke of — use the RECO laws and, also, bring them up on charges of treason; starting with the ACLU. Unless, we TAKE back, without doubt or ambiguity, WHAT AMERICA TRULY WAS, the only way to prevent a future revolution would be that there is an ENTIRE, top to bottom, regeneration of individuals who overtake (through the political process, not revolution) ALL government at the same collective time and turn back the clock. One politician at a time will not make it happen; for, sadly, when “one at a time” go into DC on their own, they lose their “original(ist) constitutional” (true Conservatism) way.
Last Full Blown Post: “Voting for the Lesser Evil” (i.e., Voting for One Sell-Out Conservative at a Time)
January 28th, 2007 at 1:19 am
Warrior, glad you picked this subject as I have been going on about this with friends and family.
Imagine the uproar if there were a United Caucasian College Fund. Or a White History Month.
I have been discusing with my daughter (remember that situation, my friend) why I think there has been such an “uproar” about gay marriage. I went online with her and showed both kids how there are gay only cruises, and even “gay friendly” hotels. There is much more to this story, but I will go into that another time.
My point is this, imagine what the gay community would do if there was a cruise line that advertised “for heterosexuals only.” There would be a bunch of panties in a twist over that, just as there would be over a white guys college fund. WHY is it okay for the minorities, gay, black, brown, etc. to have descrimination against the rest of us? These groups that CLAIM to want tolerance and diversity can at times be the least tolerant of all of us.
And I thank you for finding the right words to differentiate, as you put it, “prejudice and racism.” Racism, like you say, is never good. I think the best way to desciribe prejudice is with a joke I heard from a black comedian……”When I see five bald white guys coming at me, I am not thinking ‘cancer patients.”
Be well,
Sponge
January 29th, 2007 at 12:32 am
Let them have their way…. Send them all to an Qaint little Island somehwere ourside of Africa or whereverthehellvil i really dont give a crap, but give them their place and their own time to do what they want and let them carry on and do their Black..”HomeBoy.., Thug, Gangster, Homie…” TomFoolery Bc. On their own time, Let them get settled in and happy in their new and “Liberated Paradise” …. Then Drop about 30 million tons of TNT on all of Ebonix, Rap Malarky Country… Blast’um off, Send ‘Em to the Depths as far as I’m Concerned and Im Glad someone else Makes a Point to Let people Know that its not Racism and Were not Singeling out Anyone Person Or AnyOne Race this is America last i checked and it comes with my Rights of Freedom to Hate Who ever i Want behim, Jew, Christian, Black, White, Yellow, Red, Or Dot Head, As long as My Head Rests on the pillow at the end of the Day and remains Rich with Positivity…
January 29th, 2007 at 2:54 pm
All true. A black guy can say anything and get away with it but if a white guy says something everybody goes nuts. People have to stop and think about what they are wasting their time on and do something productive.
January 29th, 2007 at 5:57 pm
Yes, I’ll admit it…….I’m a prejudice man. Everyone is (I don’t care who or what you are), to some extent. My prejudices are not at all directed to race……..period. I’m prejudiced towards ones behaviors and attitudes. Here’s an example: If I see a black man walking down the same side of street as me at night, I may or may not cross to the other side. It just depends upon the individual and the image they may portray. They could be a well dressed individual, or a one of suspect attire. First of all, I’m too proud and fearless to run from dangerous situations……period. I just deal with the moment as it unravels. The truth is that this scenario has nothing to do with the person being a black man, but the image thay are portraying. Ask yourself this…………..would this same situation matter if the person was white instead. Again, the situation and your personal “gut instinct” is what influences you, not ones race. Some may say Im being somewhat stereotypical……maybe……….but stereotypes don’t become labeled as such by accident. I had just to throw that out there.
January 29th, 2007 at 6:05 pm
“Someone like that, who is so clearly racist should be excommunicated right out of this country pronto!”
Excommunicated? I thought you said he was a college professor, not a member of a church?
“The best answer I can give you is to teach your children the difference between “prejudice” and “racism.” The former a necessary good thing; the latter flatout wrong.”
Actually the former invariably leads to the latter. Thus, both are wrong.
January 30th, 2007 at 2:33 am
the main thing that needs to be understood is that racism is wrong. civil rights movement, however, was racist. it’s wrong for a man who runs a business to discriminate against all blacks or any other race. that is racism. however, he should have the right to discrimate wrongly. on the other hand, for someone to be hired simply because they are black, it’s racism just the same. no, not reverse racism–racism. and how must that feel for a black person if they acknowledge it? “I’m going to college because i’m a nigger!” It always has that look to me, and it must have that feel for those involved, that they are being rewarded for a flaw, as if being black makes one inferior. you see, this is the most vicious of all racisms. it creates that mixed, disgusting feeling.
i mean, at least the germans during the nazi period had that feeling of, “i’m german, i’m better than you. were the best because of our race, we deserve the best.” it’s racism the same, but at least they had it in their mind they were being rewarded for a superior attribute. psychologically, for those black people who acknowledge it and admit it to themselves, it must be adverse.
ayn rand said it best: just because you belong to the same race as brahams, that doesn’t put you on his level of genius, artistic brilliance. some black stupid ignorant motherfucker isn’t on the same level as a black genius. she said that basically, just different words.
so, VI, i looked at your post and i laughed. white people when together, we make fun of blacks, say things that you say. however, when you hate, you cross the line. retaliating with a white college fund–although that would be funny–is being no different and no less racist than those you speak so harshly of. and when you write death threats to black atrhletes telling them to stop fornicating with white women, you reach that same level of stupidity that is attributed to all black people by racists.
and don’t get me started on feminists who unite (or at least attempt to) with all women. and our next president–it’s all that idiot bill clinton’s fault.
January 30th, 2007 at 8:55 am
I’ve always thought about this double standard. Imagine if a white person, or even an asian person, talked about the extermination of black people. There’d be people (of all races) protesting in the streets right now. I don’t understand why some of us have to watch what we say so much more than others.
January 30th, 2007 at 12:01 pm
Warrior - you advise parents to teach their children the difference between prejudice and racism. I would appreciate it if you would take a moment to clarify what you mean by these terms and, furthermore, why you believe prejudice is a “necessary good thing” whilst racism is “flatout wrong”.
February 1st, 2007 at 5:08 pm
You said: “The best answer I can give you is to teach your children the difference between “prejudice” and “racism.””
I agree, except that you may have to buy a dictionary that is some decades old now not to find the definition of ‘prejudice’ muddled and mixed up with the modern usage. I won’t quote it all here but you can use Google to hit all the online dictionaries on the word for a sample of where it’s gone. ‘Discrimination,’ another worthy alternative, has been taken down right along with prejudice: (from Princeton’s Wordnet online dictionary) “unfair treatment of a person or group on the basis of prejudice.”
“It’s a beautiful thing, the destruction of words… Don’t you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought? In the end we shall make thoughtcrime literally impossible, because there will be no words in which to express it.” –funny that a Socialist in his day (Orwell) feared what Socialists of our day embrace.
Another problem with the whole “special groups” situation: those within the group who object to political overcorrectness become pariahs in the larger community. A prime example would be Bill Cosby. Cosby used to be hailed as a role-model for kids (black or otherwise) a few decades ago, before he decided to be a decent role model in an increasingly corrupt society. Maybe you can relate…
Sponge: you brought up (so called) homosexuals in relation to this topic. Surely you don’t equate a perversion (or mental disorder) to ethnicity… do you?
February 3rd, 2007 at 6:17 am
No, Mantic. I was pointing out how so many minority groups are actually more bigoted than the “majority.”
Also, IMO, the actions of any of these groups CAUSE more bigoty becuase of the backlash.
Be well,
Sponge
February 18th, 2007 at 4:04 am
I used to go to a spiritual school based on secret western schools of wisdom that taught that there were many different types of people. Asia constitutes half the world population while Europe about 21 percent and Africa about 8 percent. I don’t know if anyone else has noticed, but Asians tend to be a certain way while Europeans a certain way, etc. Asians tend to be moving and instinctive centered while Europeans seem to be more emotionally and intellectually centered. My aim is to get people to understand each other better instead of fighting and arguing unneccesarily. I was taught that this kind of knowledge from these kinds of schools were forced into secrecy(one major reason being that the Church had a monopoly on God.) We can clearly see that even now there are forces at work that don’t neccesarily bring people together but prevent knowledge from being given to the people.
So the different suits in a common deck of cards represent the four centers of gravity that I mentioned above: hearts - emotional center, diamonds - intellectual, spades - movement; clubs - instinctive center.
We all have all but some people tend to be centered in one of those.
There’s a lot of info in this area which can be googled under “The Fourth Way”, G.I. Gurdjieff, P.D. Ouspensky, and/or Rodney Collins.
Maybe we ARE entering the New “Age of Enlightenment” where knowledge once again flows freely.
(If not, there’s always Warriorism)
Julian
February 19th, 2007 at 2:55 am
I’m going to attempt to make a post here riddled in objective thought and logic, so bare with me. First of all I’m VERY racially mixed myself, so I might have a slightly different viewpoint over what I presume might be the white majority here.
A lot of people like to complain about the advantages that blacks have to get their foot in the door of opportunity. Some claim it is even unfair, but I disagree. Blacks have those advantages to even up a bit a playing field that is not fair in the world. I’m not trying to play the race card here, but let’s face it, in America when a white child is born it’s born ten steps ahead of a black child….etc. in terms of opportunity. America is a white ran country contrary to what some racist whites that have not figured out the best way to utilize their advantage in skin color would like to think.
Now don’t get me wrong, there is nothing wrong with being white or being proud that you are. But there is always going to be an instant negative overtone to someone wearing a “White Power” shirt over someone wearing a “Black Power” shirt. Due to white people’s history of racism on Native Americans and blacks that people have not forgotten about. So yes when someone sees a “White Power” shirt they’re going to think the person is racist whether they mean the shirt to convey such a message or not. If you’re white and you like to endorse such messages on clothing and you don’t mean for it to be racist, you have to accept the responsibility and instant stigma you’re labeled with as a result of that.
Someone earlier said people would flip if they had a White History month in schools I presume. I don’t think people would flip out over that as much as they would find it to be pointless, considering for the majority of the school year you’re taught nothing but of white people’s accomplishments in history. At least that is how it was at my schools. That’s why Black History month was created in the first place, was to combat that. The end point I’m making is, it’s not a level playing field in the country and that’s why minorities have the advantages they do today. But to me it doesn’t level the playing field up, just makes the odds more pleasing (I say that loosely) to navigate through.
But for any black to hate whites to the point he thinks people of his race should rise I presume and exterminate them is dumb. For every black person in the world, there’s ten white people. So that’s a futile fight to wage, unless they intend to get help from other races in the country for the revolution. But racism is quite stupid and pointless to me no matter what you are.
February 19th, 2007 at 7:02 pm
Is it really that threatening to all of us that minority groups are allowed to create exclusive ventures within their community? Granted, this is a double standard, but the underlying reasons justifying such a limitation on the ability of the white majority to form exclusive groups are undeniably absent when considering the same conduct on behalf of minority groups. If you consider this from a strict population standpoint then the difference between minorities and the majoity seem relatively minor. If you look, however, from the far more realistic standpoint of the social standing and aggregate wealth of the various ethnic groups, there is a stark contrast between white america and everyone else, and this is not a function of whites being more motivated, harder working, or smarter. Rather, it is a function of the fact that prior to the civil rights movement this country was so starkly divided along racial lines that, all things being equal so far as competence, intellect, work ethic, and every other qualifying factor is concerned, a member of a minority group could not avail himself of the same opportunities as a member of the white majority.
Again, this is illustrative of the vacuum in which the neo-con ideology operates. You all might argue that this is reverse discrimination against white america, but the fact of the matter is that white america controls 90% of the wealth in this country. Your argument would be completely valid if minorities controlled a portion of the wealth in this country proportional to the percentage of the population they constitute, but those figures are grossly disproportionate. Until those values come into line with one another, the argument that reverse racism is placing white america at a disadvantage is valid only in the sense that we are not as advantaged as we once were. We are by no means less advantaged than any of these minority groups, and allowing them to enrich their own communities is a necessary step to get to the point which all of you seem to think we are already at. You claim our freedoms are being violated by denying us the right to discriminate, but ignore the equally valid argument that allowing the majority to exclude minority groups would for all intents and purposes defeat their ability to climb socially to the point where the average wealth of a member of any minority group would be comparable to that of a member of the majority. Until that occurs then the level playing field you all claim we are on is a fiction.